Will the Gardai seize our Prayer Books?

May 1st, 2009 | By | Category: Church of Ireland Comment

The Minister of Justice, Dermot Ahern proposes to introduce a crime of blasphemy.  The Minister argues that such a measure is an expression of Article 40, 6.1.1 of the Constitution of Ireland

“The State shall endeavour to ensure that organs of public opinion, such as the radio, the press, the cinema, while preserving their rightful liberty of expression, including criticism of Government policy, shall not be used to undermine public order or morality or the authority of the State.

“The publication or utterance of blasphemous, seditious, or indecent material is an offence which shall be punishable in accordance with law.”

The Irish Times reports that  the Defamation Bill will contain a clause stating

“A person who publishes or utters blasphemous matter shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable upon conviction on indictment to a fine not exceeding €100,000.”

“Blasphemous matter” is defined as matter “that is grossly abusive or insulting in relation to matters held sacred by any religion, thereby causing outrage among a substantial number of the adherents of that religion; and he or she intends, by the publication of the matter concerned, to cause such outrage.”

Does that mean that if I state that the Pope is erroneous; that if I say Roman Catholic doctrine is repugnant; that if I say Roman Catholic teaching gives rise to superstitions; that if I say having a Mass said for someone who has died is a blasphemous fable; then, if some member of the Roman Catholic Church takes offence, I can be brought before a court and fined €100,000, and presumably be imprisoned when I refuse to pay the fine?

Not only that, does it mean that Gardai can break through the door of my church and confiscate our property?  This seems to be part of what is proposed:

Where a person is convicted of an offence under this section, the court may issue a warrant authorising the Garda Síochána to enter, if necessary using reasonable force, a premises where the member of the force has reasonable grounds for believing there are copies of the blasphemous statements in order to seize them.

The ‘blasphemous’ comments against the Pope and his church are of course part of the Anglican Thirty Nine Articles of Religion.

Article XIX: ‘Of the Church’, talks about error:

As the Church of Jerusalem, Alexandria, and Antioch have erred: so also the Church of Rome hath erred, not only in their living and manner of Ceremonies, but also in matters of Faith.

Article XXII: ‘Of Purgatory’, talks about repugnant doctrine:

The Romish Doctrine concerning Purgatory, Pardons, Worshipping, and Adoration as well of Images as of Reliques, and also invocation of Saints, is a fond thing vainly invented, and grounded upon no warranty of Scripture, but rather repugnant to the Word of God.

Article XXVIII: ‘Of the Lord’s Supper’, condemns superstitions

Transubstantiation (or the change of the substance of Bread and Wine) in the Supper of the Lord, cannot be proved by holy Writ; but is repugnant to the plain words of Scripture, overthroweth the nature of a Sacrament, and hath given occasion to many superstitions.

The Body of Christ is given, taken, and eaten, in the Supper, only after an heavenly and spiritual manner. And the mean whereby the Body of Christ is received and eaten in the Supper is Faith.

The Sacrament of the Lord’s Supper was not by Christ’s ordinance reserved, carried about, lifted up, or worshipped.

Article XXXI: ‘Of the one Oblation of Christ finished upon the Cross’, is unambiguous is describing the sacrifice of the Mass as a ‘blasphemous fable:

The Offering of Christ once made is that perfect redemption, propitiation, and satisfaction, for all the sins of the whole world, both original and actual; and there is none other satisfaction for sin, but that alone. Wherefore the sacrifices of Masses, in the which it was commonly said, that the Priest did offer Christ for the quick and the dead, to have remission of pain or guilt, were blasphemous fables, and dangerous deceits.

Were I a traditional Catholic, I think I should be pretty offended at my weekly worship being described as a ‘blasphemous fable’ and were I feeling particularly aggrieved, I think I should want to complain to the authorities.  The courts would be hard pressed not to find the Articles ‘grossly abusive or insulting in relation to matters held sacred’ and would have to find against the Church of Ireland and confiscate copies of the Book of Common Prayer where the Articles appear on pages 778-789.

Of course, when summoned,  I would present my own series of complaints against the Pope who dismisses both our church and our sacraments, something I find deeply offensive.

I look forward to meeting the Pope in court.

Leave a comment »

  1. Shades of Berlin March 10th. 1933 the burning of the books

  2. Such a law would inevitably be used by certain groups. Danish cartoonists would be banned.

  3. Congratulations on your award. Just have to get the synod one again now.

  4. Should I have said congratulations on your nomination. I only saw the last two images of the side bar and thought you’s won. good luck.

  5. Surely the articles were written at a time when the Protestant faith had a huge beef with the Papacy. Seems a bit old fashioned these days. Mind I had no idea they existed. Aren’t we all part of the Holy Catholic Church. Still the Pope’s an ass stuck in a middle age ivory tower . .there come and get me if you will!

  6. […] Ian Poulton addthis_url = ‘http%3A%2F%2Fbocktherobber.com%2F2009%2F04%2Fcrimes-of-blasphemous-libel’; […]

  7. Agree with you, Baino, but the Pope has not shifted one inch from what appears to many people to be medieval thought.

  8. How can something be truthful in the past but not be truthful today!

  9. Truth has always been something that unfolded through the centuries – as any study of the history of science demonstrates.

Leave Comment