Everything and nothing

Jul 6th, 2010 | By | Category: Personal Columns

A tale is told of a music professor who would be tormented by his students at the dead of night.  There was a practice room just below the professor’s college rooms and they would go in during the early hours of the morning and play an arpeggio on the piano, repeatedly leaving out the final note.  The professor would finally come down the stairs in his dressing gown, the sound of his approach scattering the students, and play the single missing note.  He could not bear things not to be complete.

The professor’s behaviour was completely irrational; why stir from his bed when he could have sung the missing note to himself? 

Perhaps there is an odd instinct to have public completeness, like the cards you used to get in tea packets and stick in an album, or the coins that Esso used to give out with petrol to mark the World Cup (somewhere in this house there is a board holding 30 coins bearing the images of England’s 1970 World Cup squad – an aunt worked at a garage and helped me collect them).

The urge to complete collections of things, to make sure all the notes are there, prompted the purchase yesterday of the collected plays of Samuel Beckett and the collected poems of Patrick Kavanagh to fill in some gaps on the shelf.

Beckett would presumably have regarded the idea of completion of a set as pointless; he sent his agent to collect his Nobel Prize, feeling no compulsion to attend a ceremony that most writers would have felt to be the culmination of their career.

As his work progresses, it seems to become more sparse, have more gaps, have bigger and bigger areas the reader must complete.  There was never an abundance; Vladimir and Estragon in Waiting For Godot are left without meaning or direction.  In his 1981 play ‘Quad’ words are dispensed with altogether, anonymous figures pace back and forth across a square while percussionists play to accompany the movements.  Maybe Beckett is the counterpart to the music professor; maybe completeness is not in adding but in subtracting, taking elements away one by one until everything is completely gone.

Freedom’s just another word for nothin’ left to lose’ says Kris Kristofferson’s line from ‘Me and Bobby McGee’.  Maybe he’s right; maybe collecting things is just a denial of the way things are.

Leave a comment »

  1. Wow Ian, I never realised you got the whole collection of the 1970 world cup squad coins…….was the back board that they all fitted into blue???

  2. The only problem with the set was that they finalised it before the squad was finalised and at least one of the players featured never went to Mexico

  3. I dunno I think you’re either a ducks in a row person or not. I keep saying I’m not a collector but I do manage to hoard bits that seem to match and fit and look complete. That play is just bizarre? Whoever heard of a play with no words. A bit pretentious if you ask me.

  4. By the least pretentious writer ever!

  5. Collecting things is probably irrational. It works until you have that moment of enlightenment when it occurs to you that:
    1.You can survive just fine without them.
    2. They are probably worthless (stamps, cigarette cards, etc).
    3. They may be getting in the way of you achieving or creating new things.
    The moment of enlightenment may only occur when forced upon one.
    Having said that, I’m a bit of a hoarder myself. I didn’t have the World Cup coins, but I had the 1970 football league league coin set from ESSO. It was the year Chelsea beat Leeds, which led me to support Chelsea for a while – they had that song (bom bom bom bom Esso blue) and someone I was not keen on supported Leeds. Decades later I no longer support the Blues. If I had to pick a team or teams, the line-up would be Derry City/Bolton Wanderers/Wycombe Wanderers. However, it turns out me son now supports Chelsea. I suspect it’s only because they’re winning – but then who am I to talk.

  6. I started supporting Chelsea that year – gave up the day they sacked Claudio Ranieri

Leave Comment