Ireland under judgement?

Jun 24th, 2011 | By | Category: Ireland

Stepping out the front door of where he lived, I turned and commented that the weather was bad; especially bad for the time of year.

“It’s because of badness”, he said.

“Sorry?”  Did I really hear him?

“My father always told me that Ireland had done so many bad things that it would always be punished”.

Are there seriously people in the 21st Century who believed the country to be under some sort of national judgement? This is the stuff of the 1840s.

Charles Trevelyan, Assistant Secretary at the British Treasury during the years of the famine wrote:

The judgement of God sent the calamity to teach the Irish a lesson, that calamity must not be too much mitigated. …The real evil with which we have to contend is not the physical evil of the Famine, but the moral evil of the selfish, perverse and turbulent character of the people.

Trevelyan saw the famine as punishment for a failing in the national character.  Protestant evangelist Edward Nangle saw the famine as divine punishment for much more specific actions:

The Government resolve to endow in a permanent form the fountain-head of Popery in Ireland — the Royal (?) College of Maynooth. The Universal Protestantism of Great Britain and Ireland revolts, and with a million and a half voices deprecates the measure. This is of no avail. The miserable minority of men in power accomplish tliis infatuated purpose. It is done ; and in that very year, that very month, the land is smitten, the earth is blighted, famine begins, and is followed by plague, pestilence, blood! The work of encouragement to Popery proceeds ; the essentially Popish Board of Irish National Education has been doubly, trebly endowed and chartered ; the Popish priesthood are flattered, and unconstitutional, illegal titles are heaped upon the Hierarchy. A state endowment is lavishly offered to them, and, parallel with all this, pestilence grows and increases, famine spreads, civil war and rebellion stalk through Ireland.

It almost defies belief that anyone who claimed to believe in the preacher of the Sermon on the Mount could see the death of a million innocent people as a reasonable outcome of God being cross at the Government giving money to the college at Maynooth.  What sort of God could so entirely miss the target of Nangle’s wrath and instead hit hapless men, women and children? What sort of God would let them die crossing the Atlantic?  What sort of God would have allowed the infection and the fever of the ports they reached?

This is the logic of US right-wing politics; the sort of reasoning that argues the flooding of New Orleans and the suffering caused to tens of thousands of poor people was God expressing a dislike for gay and lesbian people.  If that was the case, why did God not hit them directly?  It is perverse thinking.

Perverse, but obviously persisting in the minds of some Irish people.  It is worrying that there might be more like him out there.

Leave a comment »

  1. Judgement is at the heart of Gods word. Look at the injustices being perpetuated by lovers of evil today. In the absence of direct revelation it is not possible to know if certain calamities are or are not judgement from on high. We are free to hold a view just as we are free to do good or evil. God does punish wickedness both now and into eternity. This may make a person uncomfortable but truth is truth. It is sad however that many of our forefathers during the famine years had so little regard for the word of God.

  2. Even a brief reading of New Testament theology would show that the idea of innocent people being punished for some notional national “sin” is a contradiction of the death of Jesus that all might have life.

Leave Comment