It was the anniversary of the Normandy Landings today.
When I was at school, the D-Day Landings were still the stuff of current affairs, one man who had been there lived at the other end of our row of council houses. He was a road man with the local district council, not a figure from history.
Our history had much more about the Normans landing than about the Normandy Landings.
The Normans were the first group I remember in our primary school history. Perhaps it was the 900th anniversary of the Battle of Hastings in 1966 that had propelled the invaders into the mind of the teacher. There had been a wonderful set of postage stamps based on the Bayeux tapestry that exercised a strange fascination for years afterwards.
The teacher would tell us about the heroic English who had marched north to defeat the Norwegian invaders at the Battle of Stamford Bridge and who had then marched 200 miles south in five days – an extraordinary achievement – and had been exhausted when they faced the army of William, Duke of Normandy on a hillside near the town of Hastings.
Each time the story was told there was an irrational wish that this time the retelling of the history would result in an English victory.
It must be some fifty years since that strange feeling that there might be an account of the Battle of Hastings in which Harold would win and Anglo-Saxon England would survive. There was a wish that the arrow that would bring down King Harold would miss; that his body would not be dismembered; that the English would not be slaughtered in those Sussex acres.
The childhood wish for a Saxon victory was maybe rooted in some sense of a lost past.
I have a surname that is a toponymic, it is a name derived from the place from which people came. Norman records show that a number of places called Poulton existed prior to the conquest, so those who would in later times assume the surname ‘de Poulton’ were presumably those whose families had been part of Saxon communities.
Had the Normans treated badly those who were my ancestors? Had they become second class people in the new kingdom?
But even if they had, what matter? There is hardly a community that has not had blood on its hands at some point in its history.
Was there something more to a junior class dislike of the Conqueror? Was it part of a centuries long fear of invaders? Was there some atavistic dislike of the French, a nation still caricatured in English tabloid newspapers?
It is odd – the people who would bring Britain into a new era with new administration, and grand architecture, and economic growth, evoking such a feeling?
Maybe there were other schoolboys who were cheering while I was booing.
That period is getting a thorough going over using the tools available in computors. Now some of the stuff popping to the surface is useless, but quite a bit is showing the differences and similarities. Cross analysis from town archives, wills, judgements and data going to the centre is a bit of a wow.
For what it’s worth. I’d have said your name was pre-Norman, but when you mentioned the ‘De’ I’ve had to revise. Unless it was some scribe making an error in an assumption that had a large land owner thinking due to the size they must be Norman.
I’ve been running with ‘Cast’ thesedays for I think it better explains the system in England, and for that matter Ireland now, where there was much more of a mixing.
When the studies get to the church lands of the pre-Tudor era then we’ll get some real surprises I feel.
Ohh, Time Team did a dig up in Cheshire at a place called Poulton, finding a monastery attributed to the Cistercians.