Comments

Uneasy truths — 2 Comments

  1. I think the term supernatural is damaging in that it removes a central element of our relationship with God. This is not to discount the experience of the vast majority of Christians who do not encounter God everyday in their lives.

    However our lives should be led in obedience to the guidance of God whether that be from impartation, the Bible or the counsel of our fellow Christians. Coming from a charasmatic background I find it impossible to imagine a world where God isn’t taking an active part in my life.

    It’s fundamentally an issue of control. Some people fear what a radical church on fire for God impacting their local community might do.

  2. The following is taken from Julius Africanus'(a pagan convert to Christianity, of Roman descent) The History of the World ca 220AD. Thallus, whom he quotes, wrote his history of the eastern Mediterranean in about 52AD, and attempts to prescribe a naturalistic explanation to the darkness:

    “On the whole world there pressed a most fearful darkness; and the rocks were rent by an earthquake, and many places in Judea and other districts were thrown down. This darkness Thallus, in the third book of his History, calls, as appears to me without reason, an eclipse of the sun. For the Hebrews celebrate the passover on the 14th day according to the moon, and the passion of our Savior falls on the day before the passover; but an eclipse of the sun takes place only when the moon comes under the sun. And it cannot happen at any other time but in the interval between the first day of the new moon and the last of the old, that is, at their junction: how then should an eclipse be supposed to happen when the moon is almost diametrically opposite the sun? Let opinion pass however; let it carry the majority with it; and let this portent of the world be deemed an eclipse of the sun, like others a portent only to the eye. Phlegon records that, in the time of Tiberius Caesar, at full moon, there was a full eclipse of the sun from the sixth hour to the ninth–manifestly that one of which we speak. But what has an eclipse in common with an earthquake, the rending rocks, and the resurrection of the dead, and so great a perturbation throughout the universe? Surely no such event as this is recorded for a long period.”

    His quote of Phlegon of Tralles is most interesting. Phlegon was a Greek historian who wrote in Olympiades he Chronika 13 (ca 137AD) that in the fourth year of the 202nd Olympiad [33AD] there was ‘the greatest eclipse of the sun’ and that ‘it became night in the sixth hour of the day [noon] so that stars even appeared in the heavens. There was a great earthquake in Bithynia, and many things were overturned in Nicaea.’

    Phlegon records that after the ‘eclipse of the sun’ that a great earthquake occured. Since the Bible shows that Jesus was crucified on the same year, and that an earthquake occured after his death (cf Matthew 27:51), is it really that hard to believe the gospel accounts of Christ’s death?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *