Unheard voices — 2 Comments

  1. I don’t know Ian, sometimes we receive ‘standard’ letters from share registries and the ATO which simply don’t apply to the situation because they have no ‘standard’ letter for the actual issue at hand. This sounds like some pompous clerk not paying attention. Then out here we have “Tall Poppy” syndrome . . .significant people are also targetted simply for ‘being’ significant.

  2. Your letter sounds very much standard uncivil service response. Probably arrived on a desk Friday afternoon when a minor clerk wanted to skive off a bit earlier than he/she should. Suggest returning letter asking them to clarify their remarks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>