No paper — 8 Comments

  1. The newspaper industry is going through a state of turmoil. They diverisified into “online media” but are not now seeing the financial returns that they once thought they would from these ventures.

    I now much rather prefer to read Google News every day to catch up on what’s happening in this world and check out various blogs for opinions and lifestyle features.

    Just like the clergy man who earlier this week announced the commencement of his fifteen minute “quickie” service we all have to change with the times to meet modern demands.

  2. That day is coming I fear Ian. Although paper sellers are long gone from our streets. These days they just roll them up in glad wrap and hurl them from a speeding vehicle onto your lawn! then again, I think like books, there will always be a ‘market’ for newsprint . . besides, how else would we clean our windows to a sparkling transparency?

  3. Newspapers, morning and evening and the dreaded weed (ciggies) were the life blood of corner newsagents for many years. The greeting was welcoming and FREE, while nowadays the staff change like we do our socks, are poorly paid an show little recognition never mind interest in finding the items we want to purchase.

    I must say I prefer to find my news online, my arms no longer enjoy holding newspapers that are ¾s full of Advertising for items I do not want.

  4. Sad about newspapers surely.

    As far as the internet is concerned, you need to find blogs that you trust and confine yourself to these. Although there is no independent editorial control, such blogs live on their reputations and that can be a sufficient quality control. Mind you, the existence of an editorial structure in the hardcopy newspapers did not guarantee standards either. Most of them had an agenda and in the event were prisoners of their advertisers to a greater or lesser degree.

  5. I would say most blogs that I view have better quality control that most newspapers. It is sad that you can read traditional quality broadsheets from cover to cover in under 15 minutes – it would take a few minutes longer if you wish to read some of the rubbish contained within.

    Funny really because when you calculate the cost over an hour it equates to the minimum wage. Newspapers are dumbing down to fill space, volume is vanity but quality is sanity.

  6. Wasn’t the Financial Times known as the Pink Un – though that’s not the one you’re thinking of I’m sure.
    I get a lot of my news online these days – via twitter and trusted blogs. But I’ll be sad to see newspapers go completely. But the interesting newspaper vendors are being killed off even without online news, in many cases it’s free papers that are delivering the coup de grace. (I wrote about one mate’s last days, you already saw it I think Ian )
    But I’m more worried about books becoming digital artefacts – data files on electronic readers – if I don’t hurry up and get my own book done and dusted and out there, it’ll be too late. I don’t think there’ll be that same feeling of pride holding an electronic entry in my hand.

  7. Sorry for the delay in comments appearing – they have been going into the spam box for some reason.

    Doing a Google search, I discovered the ‘Pink Un ‘ had been the sports appear for Norwich and the “Green Un” for Sheffield, but neither would have connected with anyone I knew – I thought there was a Birmingham paper.

    I find it difficult to read more than a couple of paragraphs on a monitor and love the Saturday papers – particularly the FT. The fact that diverse people pay for them gives them a credibility that does not exist with websites other than those sites that are just the online arm of existing media groups.

  8. what is sad to see is the diminishing quality of what once were quality newspapers. Murdoch and like-minded cronies have done in the quality British papers but here we have done it all by ourselves. What is news about seeing ugly women dressed in ugly clothes prancing down a cat-walk? What is “news” about some stupid footballers not shaking handswith each other? I don’t need a weekly health supplement, a property supplement, a fashion supplement, or an advertising guide to the arts, restaurants wines, home decorating etc. etc or the rest of the 90% advertising material that constitutes today’s papers. Save the planet, stop printing all this junk and let’s get back to reporting news.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>