You will cry out for relief from the king
14th November – the birthday of the Prince of Wales. Will he ever become king, or has Diana done for him?
A search of the Net shows the enduring nature of the Diana stories. People still believe that there was a plot to murder Diana, Princess of Wales. Motivations which have been advanced for such a conspiracy include suggestions that Diana intended to marry Dodi Al-Fayed, that she intended to convert to Islam, that she was pregnant, and that she was to visit the holy land. Organizations which conspiracy theorists suggest are responsible for her death have included French Intelligence, the British Royal Family, the press, the British Intelligence services MI5 or MI6, the CIA, Mossad, the Freemasons, or the IRA. It has been suggested that the intent of some of the co-conspirators was not to cause death. Alternatively, Diana and Dodi Al-Fayed are believed to be alive and living incognito!
Sir Bernard Ingham once said of conspiracies, ‘Many journalists have fallen for the conspiracy theory of government. I do assure you that they would produce more accurate work if they adhered to the cock-up theory.’ Some of the theories surrounding Diana are similar in credibility to those suggesting Elvis is alive and well, others are just a sad reflection of the lack of confidence in public institutions. Ingham’s advice would be that the accident in Paris on that Saturday night owed much more to human frailty than to human design.
Diana was an intelligent, attractive young woman who got caught up with an entirely dysfunctional family. Whatever Christian principles the Windsor family might espouse, the tolerance of the years of Charles’ persistent adultery hardly suggests a whole-hearted commitment to upholding biblical values. Diana’s death was a tragedy, as would be the death of any young mother. Historically, it might prove in retrospect to be the last nail in the coffin of the traditional British monarchy. Charles and Camilla hardly have the glamour of the young Diana Spencer and British people have moved on from the deference once paid to aristocracy.
Monarchy has no special place in Christian thinking; the United States is vigorous in its claim to uphold biblical values and equally vigorous in its espousal of republican principles. Much more significantly, the First Book of Samuel Chapter 8 suggests monarchy is a rejection of God!
‘So all the elders of Israel gathered together and came to Samuel at Ramah. They said to him, “You are old, and your sons do not walk in your ways; now appoint a king to lead us, such as all the other nations have.”
But when they said, “Give us a king to lead us,” this displeased Samuel; so he prayed to the LORD. And the LORD told him: “Listen to all that the people are saying to you; it is not you they have rejected, but they have rejected me as their king. As they have done from the day I brought them up out of Egypt until this day, forsaking me and serving other gods, so they are doing to you. Now listen to them; but warn them solemnly and let them know what the king who will reign over them will do.”
Samuel told all the words of the LORD to the people who were asking him for a king. He said, “This is what the king who will reign over you will do: He will take your sons and make them serve with his chariots and horses, and they will run in front of his chariots. Some he will assign to be commanders of thousands and commanders of fifties, and others to plough his ground and reap his harvest, and still others to make weapons of war and equipment for his chariots. He will take your daughters to be perfumers and cooks and bakers. He will take the best of your fields and vineyards and olive groves and give them to his attendants. He will take a tenth of your grain and of your vintage and give it to his officials and attendants. Your menservants and maidservants and the best of your cattle and donkeys he will take for his own use. He will take a tenth of your flocks, and you yourselves will become his slaves. When that day comes, you will cry out for relief from the king you have chosen, and the LORD will not answer you in that day.”
When Milton Friedman’s book ‘Free To Choose’ was released in Israel, that speech of Samuel to the people was incorporated onto the cover design!
If we cut taxes by 75% we would still be a tyranny in the face of Hashem and the Prophet Samuel.
Adherence to Friedman’s free market principles would exclude heredity as a basis for high office.
(They would also exclude the corporate cronyism that characterises the banking bailout in this country)
They would indeed, despite what the clueless readers of Naomi Klein might believe.
To be fair to Klein, her objection is to the crony corporatism that Friedman would have found repugnant. He saw the role of Government as ensuring free markets – the people to whom Klein is opposed are those who want anything but free markets.
Thats the thing: Friedman could have written the same thing she did about corporatism, corporate welfare and the collusion between gvernment and big business. He himself said the biggest threat to free markets is a business interest. Yet Klein went into the most bizarre and I would say defamatory tirade against Friedman himself. She seems to be a very angry, hateful individual, probably because Friedman achieved such popularity advocating views she insists nobody really wants.
Klein is never persuasive – her writing seems imbued with a desire for the world to correspond to what she would like it to be rather than how it actually is. ‘No Logo’ seems to suggest that there are emerging coalitions that will create a Kleinian reality – if there are, they have yet to emerge.