Not farmers — 4 Comments

  1. I disagree.
    Farms were being squeezed now. And the tools available, the subsidy, was being given to all. The truth about the those moneys was there compounding of the existing inequalities. If a 100 acre guy was getting the same per acre as the 1000.
    You’ll have noted that the makers of Tipperary Blue are extremely unusual in Ireland. Usually the local maker has vanished and the produce absorbed to the Agri CoOp’s or the beef factories. Where we could have small processors operating under a sort of Bord Failte we have seven of the worlds top food companies investing anyplace but Ireland. And the same is valid in England only not quite as dismal. But in France you see the real error of Agri Policy on these islands. There every little town has a plethora of micro manufacturers. You have the sheep’s cheese makers keeping the family and maybe a second or even a third in a good income.
    Nor will the removal of the subsidy rise food prices. The UK will simply import what it needs.

  2. The 1957 Treaty of Rome envisaged a Common Agricultural Policy that ensured food security and sustained communities by keeping people on the land. The aspirations were squeezed out by powerful farming lobbies in the UK and Ireland – the richest farmers claiming a massive share of the payments.

    Without the Basic Payment, farming will only be sustainable by substantial price rises.

  3. I’m sorry but that’s untrue. If the Payments was confined to low acreage and marginal land then there might be a leveling of the market and food prices might be kept low. But as it stands the payment compounds the inequality. Put simply, if the payment is €£100 per acre the person with 100 gets 10,000, the one with a 1000 will get 100,000.
    And there is little evidence that food prices would rise in a general sense. It is far more likely that they would fall to world prices. Nor does it stand that food in the EU is safer than from outside. Nowadays with testing we can tell what the cow had for dinner. Note how many countries blocked Irish beef, in theory the safest in the world.

  4. To add, farms ‘with’ the payment aren’t sustainable. For the most part it’s prolonging an agony where the small guy is forced to compete in a market rigged to force him into losing with the larger farmer gifted the money to eventually but him out.
    I assume you’ll have noted the difference is almost double in what constitutes an economic unit in the South West of England and that of the area you know in Ireland. 300 acres in Ireland would be seen as a safe bet, in England not so much.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>