Cromwell's men are here again . . . — 4 Comments

  1. The problem with the internet is that practically *anyone* can start up their own website, and proceed to advance even the most kooky and deranged notions. There are websites out there which promote the idea that Jews control world finance, that Masons are running the country, and even some (and I kid not!)that lizards are in a secret conspiracy to overturn the food chain. Most of these appear to emanate from America and the tracts you have been given are clearly in the same category.

    These tracts may have odious characteristics but the use of biblical texts in Jacobean English is not one of them. Despite being an unabashed papaist myself, I maintain a very secret love for the King James Version. (I thought it was the norm for the CoI’s lectionary?) Although many of the words are archaic, I find that attractive becomes it comes across as more sacral and IMO is a more fitting medium for the divine words than modern English vernacular. It gives a ‘high’ ring and places emphasis on the divine origin of the words. This is especially so when compared to the insipid and banal modern translations, which I have never liked. My hatred for the Jerusalem Bible used in most Catholic churches borders on the pathological, which is one of the many reasons why I prefer Mass in Latin (where the Douai Rheims is normally used for the vernacular biblical readings).

  2. Tracts don’t bother me; it’s the mindset behind them that is troubling. The demonisation of the other community undergirded the sectarianism that was rife in our own community.

    As for language, I have no problems as long as it is not banal. (The Church of Ireland official version is the NRSV). We have Compline once a month in our church – a beautiful service. A lot of Church of Ireland people muddle the Prayer Book up with the King James Version; there are substantial differences. A man once wanted Psalm 15 read at his funeral, he knew it from the Prayer Book. But, at the funeral, it was read from the Authorised Version. So, instead of:

    LORD, who may dwell in your tabernacle?
    who may abide upon your holy hill?
    Whoever leads a blameless life and does what is right,
    who speaks the truth from his heart.
    There is no guile upon his tongue;
    he does no evil to his friend;
    he does not heap contempt upon his neighbor.
    In his sight the wicked is rejected,
    but he honors those who fear the LORD.
    He has sworn to do no wrong
    and does not take back his word.
    He does not give his money in hope of gain,
    nor does he take a bribe against the innocent.
    Whoever does these things
    shall never be overthrown.

    we got:

    LORD, who shall abide in thy tabernacle? who shall dwell in thy holy hill?
    He that walketh uprightly, and worketh righteousness, and speaketh the truth in his heart.
    He that backbiteth not with his tongue, nor doeth evil to his neighbour, nor taketh up a reproach against his neighbour.
    In whose eyes a vile person is contemned; but he honoureth them that fear the LORD. He that sweareth to his own hurt, and changeth not.
    He that putteth not out his money to usury, nor taketh reward against the innocent. He that doeth these things shall never be moved.

    The King James has not quite the charm of Matthew Coverdale!

  3. Ian, install a security camera at the gate. I hope you catch whoever it is. We can’t get away from scams and junk mail, my wesite was down for a day because of some hacker. Irish Domains told me it was an attempt by an ebay phishing scam, at first I thought the guy meant “fishing” and I thought why would anyone want to put bait and tackle onto my website!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>