Mar 4th, 2008 | By | Category: International

“The British government is considering banning all Zimbabwean sports people from competing in the United Kingdom”, according to the BBC last night. It might have considered something more pro-active. If Zimbabwe were the possessor of massive oil reserves, one might wonder if intelligence sources would suggest that it had developed weapons of mass destruction that would necessitate an invasion by coalition forces. As it is, it could barely afford the fuel for the trucks, let alone the weaponry.

Robert Mugabe is one of the most odious men on earth and his demise cannot come too soon for his suffering people. But if the British government has suddenly found its conscience and has a sincere belief in freedom, why not go to the website of Reporters sans Frontieres (RSF) and contemplate where else might be deserving of the attention focused on Zimbabwe?

What about China, which persists in its illegal occupation of Tibet and which has an appalling human rights record? What about Russia where Vladimir Putin has played musical chairs in the past week, putting in one of his own men as president while he steps down to the prime ministerial role?

The RSF annual report released on 13th February anticipates Gordon Brown’s line on Zimbabwe, its preface includes the following:

Whenever it feels powerless, the EU threatens to crack down. But dictators aren’t naughty schoolchildren who can be brought back into line with a few sharp words. Uzbekistan’s all-powerful president, Islam Karimov, hardly flinches in the face of European sanctions. Any more than Zimbabwe’s Robert Mugabe fears the action taken against him. Freezing assets abroad, refusing visas and banning travel in Europe, inspection of exports and downgrading diplomatic ties have not budged either of these two rulers. Freedom of expression is in very bad shape in both countries. The few independent journalists there know they are alone and have long stopped counting on outside help. An international arms sales embargo on China has been in force since 1989 but this has not reduced the number of rights violations.

The spinelessness of some Western countries and big international institutions is damaging freedom of expression. They are all quick to condemn developing countries that have little strategic value, but things are different when it comes to Russian President Vladimir Putin or Chinese President Hu Jintao. Western heads of state put away their lawyer’s robes and become salesmen. Trade with China and Russia is so important that human rights are rarely on the agenda. Or else they are talked about informally in very general terms. The real or false indignation of the Chinese and Russian leaders has been enough to scare even those who make the strongest protests. Who still dares to talk about the Dalai Lama or praise Taiwanese democracy to President Hu’s face? German chancellor Angela Merkel. Just her. Who can withstand the icy look of President Putin in a discussion of rights in Chechnya or about the score of journalists murdered since he came to power?

If banning a handful of sports people is all that can be done to promote freedom in the world, then dictators can rest easily in their beds.


What colour is your country?


Leave a comment »

  1. Wow, we’re only ‘satisfactory’ and I though we had very free press. Beaten hands down by UK, Scandinavia,Canada and New Zealand – oh the shame! I can understand boycotting sports events held in Zimbabwe, it’s a dangerous place but to ban visiting sports people is just silly and hypocritical in my view. I know of some people who refuse to attend the Olympic games on humanitarian grounds but we still persist in bolstering their development with resources because its self serving. (And driving up inflation I might add!) Good point Ian.

  2. From the RSF Annual Report:

    “During the legislative election campaign, the Australia’s Right to Know coalition showed that a lot of news and information was not accessible to the press and public and that this right was obstructed by at least 1,500 legal decrees and rulings. One of the leaders of the campaign, John Hartigan, chairman and CEO of News Limited, said that journalists working for his group had been banned from: accessing information in an audit of politicians’ expenses; obtaining a list of restaurants against which public health authorities had taken action; and accessing ranking of hospitals according to the quality of care. A few days after his election, Labor Party leader, Kevin Rudd promised concrete improvements in access to public information.

    Lack of rights for journalists to protect sources was demonstrated in June 2007 when two journalists working for the The West Australian in Perth were threatened with prison unless they revealed how they had obtained a confidential report of an anti-corruption commission which the newspaper had used to point the finger at a political figure”.

    Young Kevin has some work to do!

  3. Ian I have said for months that if Zimbabwe were an oil rich country our armed forces would have been there immediately the goon (Mugabe) first raised his voice.If the powers that be were really interested in the country and the plight of its people Mugabe would have been taken out a long time ago.

Leave Comment