In a secular world, the old church feast days have been forgotten, but there was a nagging feeling that tomorrow is a significant date. A check revealed it is – it is the day when the church remembers the conversion of Saint Paul.
Paul was always a fascinating character, although I always felt he was a good anglican at heart. In much of Christian teaching, he is presented to us as having a fundamental disjunction in his life: there is Saul; then there is the conversion on the road to Damascus; and he comes out the other end as Paul. Isn’t this how he has always been seen? People who suddenly change direction in their lives are described as having experienced a “Damascene conversion.”
In Tom Stoppard’s play Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, Rosencrantz articulates the general perception of Paul. This is what he says:
“Eternity is a terrible thought. I mean, where is it all going to end? (Pause, then brightly.) Two early Christians chanced to meet in Heaven. “Saul of Tarsus yet!” cried one. “What are you doing here?!” … “Tarsus-Schmarsus,” replied the other, “I’m Paul already.”
The picture is: Saul. Full stop. Return. New paragraph. Paul.
Not so, the lecturers on Paul would say. Saul is supplemented by Paul, he is not replaced; in Jewish communities he continues to be Saul.
The account of the conversion is in Acts of the Apostles Chapter 9: Saul becomes a follower of the Way. At the end of Acts of the Apostles Chapter 12, it says, “When Barnabas and Saul had finished their mission, they returned from Jerusalem.” At the beginning of Acts of the Apostles Chapter 13, it says, “While they were worshiping the Lord and fasting, the Holy Spirit said, “Set apart for me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them.”The Holy Spirit is still referring to him as Saul. Only when verse 9 of Chapter 13 does it say, “Saul, who was also called Paul”. Why this note of a change of name? Because Saul/Paul was moving into a Greek-dominated area and Paul would presumably have been more acceptable.
Paul’s is a man who is about continuity and change. In his work, Paul is prepared sometimes to shift towards the continuity end of the spectrum, and sometimes towards the change end. Such Pauline flexibility seems a good model for any organisation to adopt. The original Anglican might have something to say to those who are so concerned with change that they throw out continuity.
Tarsus-Schmarsus — No Comments
HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>